- #If statements mudlet update#
- #If statements mudlet software#
- #If statements mudlet code#
- #If statements mudlet free#
- #If statements mudlet windows#
#If statements mudlet windows#
Regarding Operating Systems: I'd only add Windows if your site offers an installer. Sy / (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC) I checked out Muby today. I'm a minor dev so I do have some knowledge, but I don't have all of it so I'm leaving some of the items blank. Just a quick note - I updated some references for muby.
Or should there just be a WSH in the vb.net column for zMUD? Muby Why not add a column for vbscript, though, since it appears to be still missing. Martin Rudat( T| C) 15:10, (UTC) JScript is now in the table, so I updated zMUD. net, and all the languages that that implies. 90.241.170.33 ( talk) 23:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC) At least theoretically, support for VBScript via WSH implies support for. Scandum 23:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC) I've made these proposed changes, corrected zMUD's scripting support (it listed many languages as WSH when in fact it only supports JScript and VBScript via WSH, neither of which is in the table), and clarified the TINTIN statement you added to explain that clients running modified versions of TINTIN's scripting language are listed under TINTIN.
#If statements mudlet update#
And I'm sure someone will update the page sooner or later when v2.0 comes out.
#If statements mudlet free#
Feel free to remove the C column and add a Lua one, preferably alphabetically sorted between 'Client Specific' and 'Perl'.
#If statements mudlet software#
(since TINTIN was public domain software that's where the comparison ends) There is also a note under the scripting table that states: Some clients run a significantly modified version of the original TINTIN scripting language, which I added with zScript in mind. The scripting language is clearly tintin derived which is more obvious in earlier versions, so yes, I'd say it's a TINTIN language as much as Mercthievia is a DIKU MUD. Oh, and is the C column really needed since no clients support it?Ĩ4.65.56.183 14:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC) The zmud site still claims: 90% compatibility with TINTIN and TINTIN+ text-based clients. The Zuggsoft website's support section has loads of info on it.Īlso, when CMUD 2.0 comes out its SSH entry will need to be changed from "No" to "Yes", and perhaps a new column for Lua could be added? CMUD will have built-in (not WSH) support for it.
It uses a TINTIN-like syntax, but it's definitely something different. I reckon CMUD and zMUD shouldn't be listed as using TINTIN for their language, but a client specific language.
Scandum ( talk) 21:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC) CMUD and zMUD not client-specific? It's difficult to say where to draw the line, zMud has MMCP support through a plugin, and the same goes for MUSHclient's MSP support, does your reasoning imply their 'yes' status should be changed to 'no' ? I think it's primarily a matter of accessibility. Not sure if there's a better way to list it, not to mention there are different levels of shell integration. Additionally tintin supports a higher level form of redirection that allows running external scripts and feeding the output back into the client for evaluation. 209.121.200.4 ( talk) 15:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC) tintin and kbtin have redirection support which allows running external console applications within the client, including ssh, lynx, and stunnel. It seems a little absurd to say that, since then pretty much every one of those columns would have a little note like that.
#If statements mudlet code#
in most of these languages and interact with whatever other interpreter or compiled code you want. I mean, you could create a COM object, P/Invoke, etc. I have no idea how that relates to scripting or SSH.Īlso, I removed the note about Ruby being able to work with other "scripting languages like C". Can someone explain this note? "CLI: command-line interface using redirection, not to be confused with system (C standard library)".
0 kommentar(er)
